Bibliography

From Anatrack Ranges User Guide
Revision as of 15:06, 4 November 2014 by Admin (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A. & Kenward, R.E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74 (5): 1313-1325. Anderson, D.J. 1982. The home range: a new non-parametric estimation technique. Ecology 63:103-112. Calhoun, J.B. & Casby, J.U. 1958. Calculation of Home Range and Density of Small Mammals. United States Public Health Service, Public Health Monograph 55. Clarke, P.J. and Evans, F.C.1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445-453.


Dalke, P.D. & Sime, P.R. 1938. Home and seasonal ranges of the eastern cottontail in Connecticut. Transcripts of the North American Wildlife Conference 3: 659-669.


Dixon, K.R. and Chapman, J.A. 1980. Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61:1040-1047.


Don, B.A.C. & Rennolls, K. 1983. A home range model incorporating biological attraction points. Journal of Animal Ecology 52:69-81.


Ford, G. & Krumme, D.W. 1979.The analysis of space use patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology 76:125-155.


Getz, W.M. & Wilmers, C.C. 2004. A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography 27: 489-505.


Glendinning, R.H. 1991. The convex hull of a dependent vector-valued process. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 38: 219-237.


Hartigan, J.A. 1987. Estimation of a convex density contour in two dimensions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:267-270.


Harvey, M.J. and Barbour, R.W. 1965. Home range of Microtus ochrogaster as determined by a modified minimum area method. Journal of Mammalogy 46:398-402.


Harris, S., Cresswell, W.J., Forde, P.G., Trewella, W.J., Woollard, T. and Wray, S. (1990). Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data - a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review 20:97-123.


Harrison, J.L. 1958. Range and movements of some Malayan rats. Journal of Mammalogy 39: 190-206.


Hayne, D.W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30:1-18.


Hemson, G., Macdonald, D.W., Ginsberg, J., Kenward, R.E., Ripley, R. & South, A.B. (2005) Are Kernels the mustard, an assessment of kernel home range estimators using GPS data from lions. Journal of Animal Ecology. 74 (3), 455-463.


Hodder, K. H., Kenward, R. E., Walls, S. S. and Clarke, R. T. 1998. Estimating core ranges: a comparison of techniques using the common buzzard (Buteo buteo). Journal of Raptor Research 32(2): 82-89


Jacobs, J. 1974. Quantitative measurements of food selection. Oecologia 14:413-417.


Jamsa, K. 1991 DOS: the complete reference. 3rd Ed. Osbourne McGraw-Hill, London.


Jennrich, R.J. and Turner, F.B. 1969. Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22:227-237.


Johnstone, I.G. (1992). Home range utilization and roost selection by non-breeding territorial European robins (Erithacus rubecula). In “Wildlife Telemetry - Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals” (I.G. Priede, and S.M. Swift, eds), 495-509. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.


Kenward, R.E. 2001. A Manual for Wildlife Radio Tagging. Academic Press, London, UK.


Kenward, R.E. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis. Academic Press, London, UK.


Kenward, R.E. 1992. Quantity versus quality: programmed collection and analysis of radio-tracking data. pp. 231-246 in I.G. Priede and S.M.Swift (Eds). Wildlife telemetry: remote monitoring and tracking of animals. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.


Kenward, R. E., Clarke, R. T., Hodder, K. H. and Walls, S. S. 2001. Distance and density estimators of home range: Defining multi-nuclear cores by nearest neighbor clustering. Ecology 82(7): 1905-1920.


Kenward, R.E., Marcstrom, V. & Karlbom, M. 1993. Post-nestling behaviour in goshawks, Accipiter gentilis. II. Sex differences in sociality and nest switching. Animal Behaviour 46:371-378.


Larkin, R.P., Halkin, D. A review of software packages for estimating animla home ranges. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22:274-287.


Macdonald, D.W., Ball, F.G. and Hough, N.G. (1980). The evaluation of home range size and configuration using radio tracking data. In A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking (C.J. Amlaner and D.W. Macdonald, eds), 405-424. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.


Otis, D.L. and White, G.C. (1999). Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. Journal of Wildlife Management 63, 1039-1044.


Robertson, P.A., N.J. Aebischer, R.E. Kenward, I.K. Hanski and N.P. Williams. (1998). Simulation and jack-knifing assessment of home-range indices based on underlying trajectories. Journal of Applied Ecology 35, 928-940


Spencer, W.D. and Barrett, R.H. 1984. An evaluation of the harmonic mean method for evaluating carnivore activity areas. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171:255-259.


Swihart, R.K. and Slade, N.A. (1985). Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66:1176-1184.


Voight, D.R. & Tinline, R.R. 1980. Strategies for analysing radio-tracking data. pp.387-404 in Amlaner, C.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (eds) A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.


Walls S.S. and Kenward R.E., 1995. Movements of radio-tagged Common Buzzards Buteo buteo in their first year. Ibis 137: 177-182.


Walls S.S. and Kenward R.E., 1998. Movements of radio-tagged common buzzards in early life. Ibis 140: 561-568.


Walls S.S. and Kenward R.E. 2001. Spatial consequences of relatedness and age in buzzards. Animal Behaviour 61: 1069-1078.


White, G.C. & Garrott, R.A. 1990. Analysis of wildlife tracking data. Academic Press, New York, USA.


Worton, B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70:164-168.


Wray, S., Cresswell, W.J. & Rogers, D. 1992. Dirichlet tessellations: a new, non-parametric approach to home range analysis. pp 247-255 in Priede & Swift.